The Three Structural Aspects of the Paper Topics Analysis of the Shermans March to the Sea

The Three Structural Aspects of the Paper Topics Analysis of the Sherman's March to the SeaThis is a paper topics analysis of the Sherman's March to the Sea by Warren G. Harding. The structure of this paper is as follows: 'This paper discusses three dominant themes in the story of Sherman's March to the Sea. Themes of compromise, teamwork, and leadership are also discussed.'The first theme is the idea of peace and its peaceful resolution. It is this idea that first stirred the discussion of the author. During his six months in Japan he had repeatedly faced threats of armed confrontation with China. During this period the United States had declared war on Japan for its invasion of Manchuria and the United States government was deeply in debt.The second theme, teamwork is about the idea of getting along in a world that was filled with conflicting interests and ideals. The author acknowledges that he is not an expert in Japan but that he was able to relate the idea of the conflict to th e United States. In Japan, it seemed there was no way of reconciling Chinese, Japanese, and American cultures. Therefore, it was necessary to find ways to bridge these cultural gaps to create the most desirable global community.The third theme is about leadership, which is about the power of first impressions and getting the country to take sides in a conflict. The author says that the United States has not been all that successful in establishing the 'first impression' of itself. He thinks that it is difficult to convince people of the need for peace unless they see the peaceful resolution in an international situation. The Japanese had done a great job of having a first impression that was favorable and that helped in winning over the minds of the American public.When looking at the problems of the Japanese government and its role in promoting peace through study groups and dialogue with theUnited States, he thinks that it could have done much more to solve the problem of the Asia n continent. Japan had made several mistakes, but he believes that Japan could have been more effective if it had not put so much emphasis on the importance of win-win negotiation and coalition building. Japan's weak political structure did not allow it to play a major role in promoting peace.The author states that the success of any successful government can be judged by the methods of the government. In other words, we must look at the methods of the government and make sure it uses effective methods of getting along.All three topics in this paper topics analysis are interrelated. It is apparent that the issues that Japan had to deal with were unlike those that the United States or any other nation had to face. Nevertheless, it was the Japanese who managed to come out on top.